Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse
Countries where authors are citing Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse
This map shows the geographic impact of Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse
This network shows the impact of Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse.
About Pharmaceutical Industry Wastewater: Review of the Technologies for Water Treatment and Reuse
This paper, published in 2014, received 624 indexed citations . Written by Chandrakanth Gadipelly, Ganapati D. Yadav, Inmaculada Ortíz, Raquel Ibáñez, Virendra K. Rathod and Kumudini V. Marathe covering the research area of Pollution, Water Science and Technology and Analytical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Water Science and Technology (310 citations), Pollution (209 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (183 citations). Published in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ie501210j.