Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements

944 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1980, received 944 indexed citations. Written by Robert R. Gagnè, Carl A. Koval and George C. Lisensky covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Electrochemistry and Analytical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (313 citations), Organic Chemistry (301 citations) and Materials Chemistry (284 citations). Published in Inorganic Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ferrocene as an internal standard for electrochemical measurements.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ic50211a080.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026