Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 591 indexed citations. Written by Andrew J. R. Watts, Ceri Lewis, Rhys M. Goodhead, Stephen J. Beckett, Julian Moger, Charles R. Tyler and Tamara S. Galloway covering the research area of Pollution, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pollution (572 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (373 citations) and Biomaterials (146 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.

Countries where authors are citing Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Uptake and Retention of Microplastics by the Shore Crab Carcinus maenas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es501090e.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026