Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es052297c →Countries where authors are citing Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics
This map shows the geographic impact of Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics
This network shows the impact of Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics.
About Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Neil M. Donahue, Allen L. Robinson, Charles O. Stanier and Spyros Ν. Pandis covering the research area of Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (1.1k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (830 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (336 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es052297c.