Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ct050289g →Countries where authors are citing Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM
This map shows the geographic impact of Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM
This network shows the impact of Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM.
About Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM
This paper, published in 2006, received 818 indexed citations . Written by Thom Vreven, István Komáromi, Stefan Dapprich, John A. Montgomery, Keiji Morokuma and Michael J. Frisch covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (370 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (217 citations) and Materials Chemistry (213 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ct050289g.