Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr9700181 →Countries where authors are citing Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut
This map shows the geographic impact of Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut
This network shows the impact of Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut.
About Structures of the Common Cyclodextrins and Their Larger AnaloguesBeyond the Doughnut
This paper, published in 1998, received 633 indexed citations . Written by Wolfram Saenger, Joël Jacob, K. Gessler, Thomas Steiner, Daniel Hoffmann, Haruyo Sanbe, Kyoko Koizumi, Steven M. Smith and Takeshi Takaha covering the research area of Oncology, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmaceutical Science (226 citations), Materials Chemistry (217 citations) and Organic Chemistry (208 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr9700181.