Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by Huw M. L. Davies and Rohan E. J. Beckwith covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (213 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (55 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Catalytic Enantioselective C−H Activation by Means of Metal−Carbenoid-Induced C−H Insertion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr0200217.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026