Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm00046a026 →Countries where authors are citing Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites
This map shows the geographic impact of Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites
This network shows the impact of Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites.
About Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Silicate-Epoxy Nanocomposites
This paper, published in 1994, received 897 indexed citations . Written by Phillip B. Messersmith and Emmanuel P. Giannelis covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (810 citations), Materials Chemistry (314 citations) and Biomaterials (207 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm00046a026.