Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings

897 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 897 indexed citations. Written by Eleanor Bradley and Peter Lang covering the research area of General Health Professions and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (314 citations), Artificial Intelligence (313 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (299 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7591341 →

Countries where authors are citing Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7591341.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026