Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*
- Authors
- Guenther SchoellmannElliott Shaw
- Journal
- Biochemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bi00902a008 →Countries where authors are citing Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*
This map shows the geographic impact of Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin* with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin* more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*
This network shows the impact of Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*.
About Direct Evidence for the Presence of Histidine in the Active Center of Chymotrypsin*
This paper, published in 1963, received 565 indexed citations . Written by Guenther Schoellmann and Elliott Shaw covering the research area of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (387 citations), Oncology (91 citations) and Organic Chemistry (77 citations). Published in Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bi00902a008.