Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom
- Journal
- Biochemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bi00815a005 →Countries where authors are citing Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom
This map shows the geographic impact of Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom
This network shows the impact of Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom.
About Isolation of bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom
This paper, published in 1970, received 394 indexed citations . Written by Fernando Q. Cunha, Diana C. Bartelt and Lewis Joel Greene covering the research area of Genetics, Microbiology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (279 citations), Genetics (128 citations) and Insect Science (97 citations). Published in Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bi00815a005.