Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 839 indexed citations. Written by Changqin Ding, Anwei Zhu and Yang Tian covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (762 citations), Molecular Biology (231 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (144 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.

Countries where authors are citing Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar400023s.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026