Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Aerospace Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Journal
- Nature Communications
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9241 →Countries where authors are citing Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms
This map shows the geographic impact of Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms
This network shows the impact of Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms.
About Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms
This paper, published in 2015, received 849 indexed citations . Written by Dandan Wen, Fuyong Yue, Guixin Li, Guoxing Zheng, Shu‐Mei Chen, Ming Chen, King‐Fai Li, Polis Wing Han Wong, Kok‐Wai Cheah and Edwin Yue‐Bun Pun covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (777 citations), Aerospace Engineering (514 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (282 citations). Published in Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9241.