Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Authors
- Da‐Gang YuBi‐Jie LiZhang‐Jie Shi
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar100082d →Countries where authors are citing Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions
This map shows the geographic impact of Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions
This network shows the impact of Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions.
About Exploration of New C−O Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions
This paper, published in 2010, received 568 indexed citations . Written by Da‐Gang Yu, Bi‐Jie Li and Zhang‐Jie Shi covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (551 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (111 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (31 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar100082d.