Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar020254k →Countries where authors are citing Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry
This network shows the impact of Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry.
About Cucurbituril Homologues and Derivatives: New Opportunities in Supramolecular Chemistry
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Narayanan Selvapalam, Hee‐Joon Kim and Kimoon Kim covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations), Spectroscopy (954 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (630 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar020254k.