Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar010110q →Countries where authors are citing Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices
This map shows the geographic impact of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices
This network shows the impact of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices.
About Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices
This paper, published in 2002, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by J. Cooper McDonald and George M. Whitesides covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (1.7k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (551 citations) and Molecular Biology (145 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar010110q.