Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex.

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1963, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by John R. Whitaker covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (701 citations), Plant Science (172 citations) and Biotechnology (170 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Determination of Molecular Weights of Proteins by Gel Filtration of Sephadex..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac60205a048.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026