Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac50043a017 →Countries where authors are citing Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
This map shows the geographic impact of Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
This network shows the impact of Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals.
About Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
This paper, published in 1979, received 9.8k indexed citations . Written by André Tessier, Peter G. C. Campbell and M. B�isson covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Analytical Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pollution (6.9k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (2.1k citations) and Environmental Chemistry (2.1k citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac50043a017.