Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues

443 indexed citations
published 2010

Countries where authors are citing Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues.

About Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues

This paper, published in 2010, received 443 indexed citations . Written by Susan D. Richardson covering the research area of Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Analytical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (202 citations), Pollution (189 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (123 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac101102d.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026