Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac00278a027 →Countries where authors are citing Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration
This map shows the geographic impact of Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration
This network shows the impact of Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration.
About Space charge effects in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. II. Mass calibration
This paper, published in 1984, received 428 indexed citations . Written by Edward B. Ledford, Don L. Rempel and Michael L. Gross covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (352 citations), Analytical Chemistry (102 citations) and Molecular Biology (94 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac00278a027.