Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 606 indexed citations. Written by Daniel W. Armstrong, Yubing Tang, Yiwen Zhou and Christina Bagwill covering the research area of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (564 citations), Biomedical Engineering (360 citations) and Molecular Biology (144 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Macrocyclic Antibiotics as a New Class of Chiral Selectors for Liquid Chromatography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac00081a019.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026