Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues

439 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 439 indexed citations. Written by Ken Hyland and Fiona Hyland covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (308 citations), Education (280 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (227 citations). Published in .

Countries where authors are citing Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026