Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference
- Authors
- Noah D. GoodmanMichael C. Frank
- Journal
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005 →Countries where authors are citing Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference
This map shows the geographic impact of Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference
This network shows the impact of Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.
About Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference
This paper, published in 2016, received 295 indexed citations . Written by Noah D. Goodman and Michael C. Frank covering the research area of Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (140 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (71 citations). Published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005.