A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032 →Countries where authors are citing A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
This map shows the geographic impact of A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
This network shows the impact of A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design.
About A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design
This paper, published in 2017, received 338 indexed citations . Written by Masaharu Tsujimoto, Yuya Kajikawa, Junichi Tomita and Yoichi Matsumoto covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (176 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (109 citations) and Marketing (65 citations). Published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032.