Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps
- Authors
- Scott G Dacko
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032 →Countries where authors are citing Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps
This map shows the geographic impact of Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps
This network shows the impact of Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps.
About Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps
This paper, published in 2016, received 338 indexed citations . Written by Scott G Dacko covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Marketing and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (216 citations), Information Systems and Management (149 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (130 citations). Published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032.