Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions

554 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 554 indexed citations. Written by Gerd Kempermann, Fred H. Gage, Ludwig Aigner, Hongjun Song, Maurice A. Curtis, Sandrine Thuret, H. Georg Kuhn, Sebastian Jessberger, Paul W. Frankland and Heather A. Cameron covering the research area of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental Neuroscience (346 citations), Molecular Biology (180 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (166 citations). Published in Cell stem cell.

Countries where authors are citing Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.004.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026