Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark

906 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 906 indexed citations. Written by Alexander J. Ruthenburg, C. David Allis and Joanna Wysocka covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (804 citations), Genetics (92 citations) and Plant Science (82 citations). Published in Molecular Cell.

Countries where authors are citing Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.014.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026