Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies
Countries where authors are citing Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies
This network shows the impact of Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies.
About Identifying, categorizing and mitigating threats to validity in software engineering secondary studies
This paper, published in 2018, received 192 indexed citations . Written by Apostolos Ampatzoglou, Stamatia Bibi, Paris Avgeriou and Alexander Chatzigeorgiou covering the research area of Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (118 citations), Artificial Intelligence (46 citations) and Software (42 citations). Published in Information and Software Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.10.006.