A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 280 indexed citations. Written by Philip Achimugu, Ali Selamat, Roliana Ibrahim and Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (204 citations), Artificial Intelligence (88 citations) and Software (50 citations). Published in Information and Software Technology.

Countries where authors are citing A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.001.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026