Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 788 indexed citations. Written by Shlomit Strulov Shachar, Grant R. Williams, Hyman B. Muss and Tomohiro F. Nishijima covering the research area of Oncology, Physiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (683 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (306 citations) and Oncology (272 citations). Published in European Journal of Cancer.

Countries where authors are citing Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.030.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026