Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols

534 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 534 indexed citations. Written by Zhongkui Li, Wei Ren, Xiangdong Liu and Lihua Xie covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (512 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (245 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (79 citations). Published in Automatica.

Countries where authors are citing Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.03.015.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026