Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations
- Journal
- Climate Dynamics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/s003820000079 →Countries where authors are citing Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations
This map shows the geographic impact of Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations
This network shows the impact of Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations.
About Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations
This paper, published in 2000, received 525 indexed citations . Written by Warren M. Washington, John W. Weatherly, Gerald A. Meehl, Albert J. Semtner, Thomas W. Bettge, Anthony P Craig, Gary Strand and Julie M. Arblaster covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (403 citations), Atmospheric Science (277 citations) and Water Science and Technology (94 citations). Published in Climate Dynamics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/s003820000079.