Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications
- Authors
- Thresia Thomas
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/pl00000852 →Countries where authors are citing Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications
This network shows the impact of Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications.
About Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications
This paper, published in 2001, received 751 indexed citations . Written by Thresia Thomas covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (650 citations), Biochemistry (214 citations) and Pharmacology (128 citations). Published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/pl00000852.