Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter

Abstract

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 739 indexed citations. Written by Andrzej Pękalski and J. Przystawa covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (619 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (438 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (82 citations). Published in Lecture notes in physics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1007/bfb0120123 →

Countries where authors are citing Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bfb0120123.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Evaluation of electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for wound healing and layered dermal reconstitution☆ Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Weak seed-pairing stability and high target-site abundance decrease the proficiency of lsy-6 and other microRNAs Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Prediction of the distribution of Arctic‐nesting pink‐footed geese under a warmer climate scenario Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper An Elicitor of Plant Volatiles from Beet Armyworm Oral Secretion Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Meta-Regression in Stata Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Industrial Microwave Heating