Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03340893 →Countries where authors are citing Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
This network shows the impact of Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms.
About Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
This paper, published in 2003, received 560 indexed citations . Written by Shane R. Jimerson and Jennifer L. Greif covering the research area of Safety Research and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (427 citations), Clinical Psychology (140 citations) and Social Psychology (125 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03340893.