Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews

676 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1988, received 676 indexed citations. Written by Helen Cooper covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (153 citations), Strategy and Management (116 citations) and Information Systems (115 citations). Published in Knowledge, technology & policy/Knowledge in society/Knowledge, technology, & policy.

Countries where authors are citing Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03177550.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026