Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity
- Journal
- Netherlands Heart Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03085963 →Countries where authors are citing Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity
This map shows the geographic impact of Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity
This network shows the impact of Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity.
About Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity
This paper, published in 2007, received 680 indexed citations . Written by Sander S. Rensen, Pieter A. Doevendans and Guillaume J.J.M. van Eys covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (282 citations), Surgery (183 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (113 citations). Published in Netherlands Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03085963.