Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.

680 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 680 indexed citations. Written by Philip D. Sloane covering the research area of General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (472 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (200 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (167 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w1942139 →

Countries where authors are citing Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w1942139.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026