A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea
- Authors
- N. J. GawelRobert L. Jarret
- Journal
- Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02672076 →Countries where authors are citing A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea
This map shows the geographic impact of A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea
This network shows the impact of A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea.
About A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure forMusa andIpomoea
This paper, published in 1991, received 406 indexed citations . Written by N. J. Gawel and Robert L. Jarret covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (334 citations), Molecular Biology (167 citations) and Genetics (93 citations). Published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02672076.