Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 741 indexed citations. Written by T. M. Fulton, Julapark Chunwongse and Steven D. Tanksley covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (622 citations), Molecular Biology (301 citations) and Genetics (147 citations). Published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

Countries where authors are citing Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02670897.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026