Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02427859 →Countries where authors are citing Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method
This map shows the geographic impact of Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method
This network shows the impact of Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method.
About Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method
This paper, published in 1996, received 549 indexed citations . Written by Sylvain Dolédec, Daniel Chessel, Cajo J. F. ter Braak and Stéphane Champely covering the research area of Statistics and Probability, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (335 citations), Ecology (269 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (178 citations). Published in Environmental and Ecological Statistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02427859.