Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces
- Authors
- Peter W. Jones
- Journal
- Acta Mathematica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02392869 →Countries where authors are citing Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces
This map shows the geographic impact of Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces
This network shows the impact of Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces.
About Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in sobolev spaces
This paper, published in 1981, received 338 indexed citations . Written by Peter W. Jones covering the research area of Applied Mathematics and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (275 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (185 citations) and Geometry and Topology (107 citations). Published in Acta Mathematica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02392869.