Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics
- Journal
- Experimental Mechanics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02325092 →Countries where authors are citing Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics
This map shows the geographic impact of Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics
This network shows the impact of Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics.
About Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics
This paper, published in 1985, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Tsuchin Philip Chu, W. F. Ranson and Michael A. Sutton covering the research area of Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (917 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (559 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (516 citations). Published in Experimental Mechanics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02325092.