The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography

729 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1987, received 729 indexed citations. Written by Michael H. Abraham and J. C. McGowan covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (446 citations), Organic Chemistry (231 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (177 citations). Published in Chromatographia.

Countries where authors are citing The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed phase liquid chromatography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02311772.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026