Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations
- Authors
- Wayne F. Velicer
- Journal
- Psychometrika
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02293557 →Countries where authors are citing Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations
This map shows the geographic impact of Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations
This network shows the impact of Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations.
About Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations
This paper, published in 1976, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Wayne F. Velicer covering the research area of Analytical Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (665 citations), Social Psychology (433 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (387 citations). Published in Psychometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02293557.