Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02074820 →Countries where authors are citing Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature
This map shows the geographic impact of Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature
This network shows the impact of Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature.
About Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature
This paper, published in 1994, received 900 indexed citations . Written by Robert C. Ford and Woodrow D. Richardson covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (696 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (335 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (230 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02074820.