Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 898 indexed citations. Written by Robert C. Ford and Woodrow D. Richardson covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (695 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (335 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (229 citations). Published in Journal of Business Ethics.

Countries where authors are citing Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02074820.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026