Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport
- Journal
- The Journal of Membrane Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01871102 →Countries where authors are citing Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport
This map shows the geographic impact of Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport
This network shows the impact of Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport.
About Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport
This paper, published in 1988, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Thomas R. Kleyman and Edward J. Cragoe covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (651 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (247 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (138 citations). Published in The Journal of Membrane Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01871102.