Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

1.8k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 1.8k indexed citations. Written by Colleen A. McHorney and Alvin R. Tarlov covering the research area of Health, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (406 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (293 citations) and General Health Professions (274 citations). Published in Quality of Life Research.

Countries where authors are citing Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01593882.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026