A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents

586 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1976, received 586 indexed citations. Written by Serge Daan and Colin S. Pittendrigh covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Physiology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (555 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (310 citations) and Physiology (173 citations). Published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Countries where authors are citing A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01417857.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026