Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I
- Authors
- Christian Lubich
- Journal
- Numerische Mathematik
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01398686 →Countries where authors are citing Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I
This map shows the geographic impact of Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I
This network shows the impact of Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I.
About Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I
This paper, published in 1988, received 522 indexed citations . Written by Christian Lubich covering the research area of Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (242 citations), Numerical Analysis (225 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (213 citations). Published in Numerische Mathematik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01398686.